Residential Real Estate in Europe: An Exploration of Common Risk Factors

Issue: 4/2015

Calin Valsan

Williams School of Business, Bishop's University, cvalsan@ubishops.ca

Elena Druica

Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, elena.druica@faa.unibuc.ro

Rodica Ianole

Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, rodica.ianole@faa.unibuc.ro

We conduct an exploratory analysis using proxy measures of cross-sectional returns and rental yields in residential real estate. Asset pricing models predict that expected returns should exhibit some sensitivity to one or several fundamental variables that represent a common source of undiversifiable risk. Residential real estate, just like works of art and collectibles, is unique because it represents both an investment vehicle and a durable consumption good. Its pricing and returns should thus reflect both the benefits from portfolio diversification and the effect of supply and demand. In this paper, we investigate the variation in proxy returns and proxy rental yields across 34 major European cities, using a handful of independent variables that should account for the influence of market risk, inflation, and liquidity. In spite of obvious limitations stemming from our sample, we find that the explanatory power of our model is unusually high for a cross-sectional data analysis. Some of our findings concur with other studies showing that in spite of strong segmentation, real estate markets respond to the same structural risk factors. A good portion of our results, however, is hard to explain and interpret. Either we need to take into account cultural differences between Eastern and Western Europe as part of a behavioral approach, or we have to concede that we have been misled by the mismatch in the level of aggregation and the crude estimation of the dependent variables.

Pages: 
413–429
DOI: 10.1515/revecp-2015-0028
JEL: R31, R15, P50, G10, G02, E21
Keywords: yields, returns, Residential real estate, Eastern Europe, behavior economics
References: 

Baker, M.; Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 129-1. DOI: 10.1257/jep.21.2.129

BALL, M.; Lizieri, C.; & MacGregor, B.D. (1998). The Economics of Commercial Property Markets. Routledge, London.

Barberis, N.; Shleifer, A.; & Vishny, R. (1998). A Model of Investor Sentiment, Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 3, 307-343.

Bokhari, S.; Geltner, D. (2011) Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications. Real Estate Economics 39.4: 635–670. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00308.x

Brunnermeier, M. K.; Julliard, C.; (2008). Money Illusion and Housing Frenzies. The Review of Financial Studies 21 (1): 135-180. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhm043

Burmeister, E.; Wall, K. D. (1986). The arbitrage pricing theory and macroeconomic factor measures. Financial Review 21 (1): 1–2.

Case, K. E.; Shiller, R. J. (1988). The Behavior of Home Prices in Boom and Post Boom Markets, New England Economic Review, November, pp. 29-46.

Colliers Report: http://www.colliers.com/en-us/-/media/files/global/pdf/colliers-internat...

Dhar, R.; Goetzmann, W. (2005). Institutional perspectives on real estate investing: The role of risk and uncertainty (No. ysm457). Yale School of Management.

Dubben, N.; Sayce, S. (1991). Property portfolio management: an introduction (pp. 128-58). London: Routledge.

Eichholtz, P.; Yönder, E. (2015). CEO Overconfidence, REIT Investment Activity and Performance. Real Estate Economics, 43: 139–162. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12054

Epstein, L. G.; Schneider, M. (2002). Learning Under Ambiguity. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=344920 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.344920

Eurostat: Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group http://www.statista.com/statistics/246355/home-ownership-rate-in-europe/

Farlow, A. (2004). The UK Housing Market: Bubbles and Buyers. Paper presented at the Credit Suisse First Boston Housing Market Conference.

Genesove, D.; Mayer, C. (2001). Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), 1233-1260. DOI: 10.1162/003355301753265561

Hargreaves, B. (2005). Exploring the yields on residential investment property.Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES).

Hungria-Garcia, R., Lind, H., & Karlsson, B. (2004). Property yields as tools for valuation and analysis. Report No. 52. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

Knoll, K.; Schularick, M.; & Steger T. (2014). No Price Like Home: Global House Prices, 1870-2012, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 10166.

Malpezzi, S. (2003). Hedonic pricing models: A selective and applied review. Section in Housing Economics and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Duncan Maclennan.

Modigliani, F.; Brumberg, R. (1954) Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function. In Post-Keynesian Economics. Edited by K. Kurihara. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1954. Pages 338–436.

Roll, R.; Ross, S. (1980). An empirical investigation of the arbitrage pricing theory. Journal of Finance 35 (5): 1073–1103

Ross, S. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13 (3): 341–360

Shiller, R. J. (2008). Historic turning points in real estate. Eastern Economic Journal, 34(1), 1-13.

Sirmans, S. G.; Macpherson, D. A.; & Zietz, E. N. (2005). The composition of hedonic pricing models. Journal of real estate literature, 13(1), 1-44.

Walden, J. (2004). Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 04-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=509643

Wang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Chan, S. H.; & Chau, K. W. (2000). Over-confidence and cycles in real estate markets: cases in Hong Kong and Asia. International Real Estate Review, 3(1), 93-108.