Characteristics of the innovation activities of firms in Europe: a critical review of international differences

Issue: 3/2017

Marek Vokoun

Department of Management, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Okružní 517/10, 370 01, Czech Republic. E-mail:

A sample of 18 papers and 32 data sets revealed 210,404 firm level observations about European firms making decisions about innovation. A total of 66,965 observations describe activities of innovators between 1986 and 2008. This paper used a basic literature review to assess properties of innovation among quite rare full CDM (Crépon, Duguet, and Mairesse) papers. This study compared results from two systems of estimation and showed that both international and regional comparisons are rather problematic because of different definitions of innovation variables and data set repre-sentativeness. On average, a typical firm that engaged in innovation was a large firm competing in international markets in the sample of firms with 20+ employees. Smaller firms, however, invested more in research and development (R&D) and no linear rela-tionship was found for output characteristics. Cooperation on R&D projects increased overall innovation intensity. There is strong evidence that public funding had an ambig-uous effect on R&D spending and no additional effect on innovation output on average. This output measured by sales from innovated goods and services was on average in a positive relationship with labour productivity; however, a detailed view suggested this effect was present only in product innovation. In this paper, it is shown that results of innovation studies cannot be compared or used in research without deeper analysis of the data sample (micro companies, industries, active firms, entrants etc.), dependent variable (innovator, R&D expenditures, sales, productivity, new product, new service etc.) and the baseline company that is defined by independent variables.

DOI: 10.1515/revecp-2017-0013
JEL: O38, O33, L60, D24
Keywords: value added, properties, innovation, expenditures, Europe, decision to innovate, attributes

ANDERSSON, M., JOHANSSON, B., KARLSSON, C. & LÖÖF, H. (2012). Innovation and Growth: From R&D Strategies of Innovating Firms to Economy-wide Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ARROW, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: R. R. Nelson (ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–626.

BAREGHEH, A., ROWLEY, J. & SAMBROOK, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision. 47 (8). pp.1323–1339. DOI:

BROZEN, Y. (1951). Invention, Innovation, and Imitation. The American Economic Review, 41(2), 239–257.

CASTELLACCI, F. (2011). How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway.Economics of Innovation and New Technology20(7), 637-658.

CLASSEN, N., CARREE, M., Van GILS, A., & PETERS, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics42 (3), pp. 595-609.

COHEN, W.M., NELSON, R.R. & WALSH, J.P. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). [Online]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: [Accessed: 9 July 2012].

CRÉPON, B., DUGUET, E., & MAIRESSEC, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivi [Ty: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology7(2), 115-158.

DAMIJAN, J. P., KOSTEVC, Č., & ROJEC, M. (2011). Innovation and firms’ productivity growth in Slovenia: Sensitivity of results to sectoral heterogeneity and to estimation method (pp. 165-193). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

DAVID, P.A., HALL, B.H. & TOOLE, A.A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy. 29 (4–5). pp.497–529.

DORAN, J., & O'LEARY, E. (2011). External interaction, innovation and productivity: an application of the innovation value chain to Ireland. Spatial Economic Analysis6 (2), pp. 199-222.

EBERSBERGER, B. & Lööf, H. (2005). Innovation Behaviour and Productivity Performance in the Nordic Region Does Foreign Ownership Matter? [Online]. Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies. Available from: [Accessed: 27 March 2012].

EFRON, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics. 7 (1). pp.1–26.

ETTLIE, J.E. & ROSENTHAL, S.R. (2011). Service versus Manufacturing Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 28 (2). pp.285–299.

FASSIO, C. (2015). How Similar is Innovation in German, Italian and Spanish Medium-Technology Sectors? Implications for the Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Distance-to-the-Frontier Perspectives. Industry and Innovation22 (2), pp. 102-125.

GILBERT, R.J. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition--Innovation Debate? Innovation Policy and the Economy. 6. pp.159–215.

GOULD, W. (1995). Jackknife estimation. Stata Technical Bulletin. 4 (24). pp.25–29.

GREENHALGH, C. & ROGERS, M. (2009). Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.

GRIFFITH, R., HUERGO, E., MAIRESSE, J., & PETERS, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford review of economic policy, 22 (4), 483-498.

GRILICHES, Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function. The American Economic Review. 54 (6). pp.961–974.

HALL, B. H., LOTTI, F., & MAIRESSE, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics33 (1), pp. 13-33.

HALL, B.H. & MAIRESSE, J. (2006). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge Driven Economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4/5), 289–299.

HALL, B.H. & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Set. Berkeley: Elsevier Science.

HALPERN, L., & MURAKÖZY, B. (2012). Innovation, productivity and exports: the case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology21 (2), 151-173.

HASHI, I., & STOJČIĆ, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366.

HECKMAN, J.J. (1976). The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 5 (4). pp.475–492.

JANZ, N., LÖÖF, H. & PETERS, B. (2004). Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - Is There a Common Story Across Countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management. Vol. 2. pp.184–204.

KUZNETS, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review. 45 (1). pp.1–28.

LEVIN, R.C., KLEVORICK, A.K., NELSON, R.R., WINTER, S.G., GILBERT, R. & GRILICHES, Z. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987 (3). pp.783–831.

LOKSHIN, B. & MOHNEN, P. (2010). How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. [Online]. United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. Available from: [Accessed: 5 April 2012].

LÖÖF, H. & Heshmati, A. (2006). On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 15 (4–5). pp.317–344.

MAIRESSE, J. & MOHNEN, P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application. The American Economic Review. 92 (2). pp.226–230.

MAIRESSE, J. & MOHNEN, P. (2010). Chapter 26 - Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. In: B. H. H. and N. ROSENBERG (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Volume 2. [Online]. North-Holland, pp. 1129–1155. Available from: [Accessed: 1 June 2016].

MANSFIELD, E. (1964). Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects, and Relation to Size of Firm and Inventive Output. The Journal of Political Economy. 72 (4). pp.319–340.

MANSFIELD, E. (1965). Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development. The American Economic Review. 55 (1/2). pp.310–322.

MANSFIELD, E. (1963). Size of Firm, Market Structure, and Innovation. The Journal of Political Economy. 71 (6). pp.556–576.

MASSO, J. & VAHTER, P. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: econometric evidence from innovation surveys. The European Journal of Development Research. 20 (2). pp.240–261.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Oslo Manual. [Online]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from [Accessed: 26 March 2016]

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from [Accessed: 26 March 2017]

POLDER, M., LEEUWEN, G. van, MOHNEN, P. & RAYMOND, W. (2009). Productivity effects of innovation modes. [Online]. University Library of Munich, Germany. Available from: [Accessed: 26 March 2016].

RAFFO, J., LHUILLERY, S., & MIOTTI, L. (2008). Northern and southern innovativity: a comparison across European and Latin American countries. The European Journal of Development Research20 (2), pp. 219-239.

RAYMOND, W., MAIRESSE, J., MOHNEN, P., & PALM, F. (2015). Dynamic models of R & D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. European Economic Review, 78, pp. 285-306.

RAYMOND, W., MOHNEN, P., PALM, F., & van der LOEFF, S. S. (2006). A classification of Dutch manufacturing based on a model of innovation. De Economist154 (1), pp. 85-105.


ROUD, V., (2007). Firm-level research on innovation and productivity: Russian experience. In: Proceeding from the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE). Maastricht. Available from: [Accessed: 4 March 2016].

SCHMOOKLER, J. (1959). Bigness, Fewness, and Research. Journal of Political Economy. 67 (6). pp.628–632.

SCHUMPETER, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

SOLOW, R. (1964). Capital, Labor, and Income in Manufacturing. In: The Behavior Of Income Shares: Selected Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Studies in income and wealth. [Online]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 101–142. Available from: [Accessed: 29 March 2016].

Van BEVEREN, I. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review. Journal of Economic Surveys. 26 (1). pp.98–128.

VILLARD, H. H., (1958). Competition, Oligopoly, and Research. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 483–497.

VOCHOZKA, M., STRAKOVÁ, J., & VÁCHAL, J., (2015). Model to Predict Survival of Transportation and Shipping Companies. Naše more. 62 (SI). pp.109–113.

VOKOUN, M., (2014). R&D and Innovation Activities, Search for Better Definitions and an Economic-Historical Approach. In Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences (No. 0402131). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

VOKOUN, M., (2016). Innovation behaviour of firms in a small open economy: the case of the Czech manufacturing industry. Empirica. 43 (1). pp.111–139.

ZELLNER, A., & THEIL, H., (1962). Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations. Econometrica. 30 (1). pp.54–78.