Productivity Development in Selected Central European Countries Measured by the Sato Production Function
Issue:
4/2018
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between economic output, labour and capital in the Visegrád Four, Austria and Germany. The main objective is to determine the type of technological progress in these countries over time, specifically in the period 1995–2015. The Sato production functions (a special case of the linearly homogeneous production function) for all the aforementioned countries are estimated using linear and nonlinear techniques. In addition to the original Sato production function, we propose modifying it in using a time variable, which allows us to analyse the development of productivity over time. Based on the NLS estimates of this modification, we create isoquant maps and calculate the value of the marginal rate of technical substitution of labour for capital to identify the nature of technological progress typical for each country. We also compare the properties of both the OLS and NLS estimates. The results are quite specific to individual countries, but there is some room for generalization.
PDF link:
PDF
Pages:
353-370
DOI:
10.2478/revecp-2018-0018
JEL:
O47, D24, C51
Keywords:
technological progress, Sato production function, production function, nonlinear least squares method, isoquants
References:
BESANKO, D., BRAEUTIGAM, R. (2007). Microeconomics. 3rd ed. Wiley.
BIEA, N. (2016). Economic growth in Slovakia: Past successes and future challenges. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/eb008_en_2.pdf. [Accessed: 20 March 2017].
BLANCHARD, O. J. (1997). The Medium Run. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 89–158.
BLAUG, M. (1985). Economic Theory in Retrospect. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
EEAG. (2012). The EEAG Report on the European Economy. The Hungarian Crisis. CESifo, Munich. 115–130. [Online]. Available at: https://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/1213659.PDF. [Accessed: 20 March 2017].
EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA). (2014) Education: the situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2016). EU's top trading partners in 2015: the UnitedStates for exports, China for imports. Eurostat Press Office. 1–6. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7224419/6-31032016-BP-EN..... [Accessed: 11 August 2018].
GREENE, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. 7th ed. Boston [u. a.]: Pearson, 1238 s.
HECZKOVÁ, M. (2014). Fakta o obchodě se zahraničím. Statistika & My, 9: 19–20.
HENNINGSEN, A., HENNINGSEN, G. (2012). On the estimation of the CES production function. Economic Letters, 115(1): 67–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.007
HICKS, J. R. (1932). The Theory of Wages. London. Macmillan.
HUMPHREY, T. M. (1997). Algebraic Production Functions and their Uses before Cobb Douglas, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 83(1): 51–83.
KMENTA, J. (1967). On Estimation of the CES Production Function. International Economic Review, 8(2): 180–189. DOI: 10.2307/2525600
KUREKOVÁ, L. M. (2015). Policy Puzzles with Roma Employment in Slovakia. CELSI Discussion Paper [Online]. Available at: https://celsi.sk/media/discussion_papers/CELSI_DP_34_.pdf5 [Accessed: 2 December 2017].
KAHANEC, M., SEDLÁKOVÁ, M. (2016). The Social and Employment Situation in Slovakia and Outlook on the Slovak EU Presidency 2016 [Online]. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/578982/IPOL_STU(2016)578982_EN.pdf [Accessed: 2 December 2017].
LEVENBERG, K. (1944). A Method for the Solution of Certain Non-Linear Problems in Least Squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2: 164–168. DOI: 10.1090/qam/10666
MAKIN, J. A., STRONG, S. (2013). New Measures of Factor Productivity in Australia: a Sato approach. Applied Economics Australia, 45(17): 2413–2422. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2012.665603
MARQUARDT, D. (1963). An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameter. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2): 431–441. DOI: 10.1137/0111030
OECD. (2007). OECD Economic Surveys: Austria 2007, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-aut-2007-en. [Accessed: 20 October 2017].
OECD. (2012a). OECD Economic Surveys: Germany 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-deu-2012-en. [Accessed: 20 March 2018].
OECD. (2012b). OECD Economic Surveys: Slovakia 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-svk-2012-en. [Accessed: 15 March 2018].
SATO, R. (1964). Diminishing returns and linear homogeneity: comment. The American Economic Review, 54: 744–745. DOI. 10.2307/1911344
SATO, R. (1975). The most general class of CES Functions. Econometrica, 43: 999–1003.
SPECKESSER, S. (2013). The Immigrant Workforce in Germany: Formal and Informal Barriers to Addressing Skills Deficits. [Online]. Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/Skills-... [Accessed: 2 December 2017].
THEIL, H. (1966). Applied Economic Forecasting, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
WITAJEWSKIJ-BALTVILKS, J. (2016). Catching