Use of TOPSIS Method for Assessing of Good Governance in European Union Countries

Issue: 3/2019

Eva Ardielli

VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Department of Public Economics, Sokolská 33, Ostrava, Czech Republic,

Good Governance presents the contemporary trend of managing public affairs worldwide. This concept is promoting the basic elements of subsidiarity, participation, and democracy in modern public administration. Presented article is focused on the evaluation of Good Governance development in the European Union countries in the long-term, in the period 2007–2017. The evaluation is based on the application of mul-tiple criteria decision-making methods, concrete The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The original data used in the research were the values of Worldwide Governance Indicators monitored and processed by the World Bank. The article presents a complete assessment of European Union countries according to the level of Good Governance. There are identified countries that have been successful in this area in the long-term, in particular the Nordic countries - Finland, Sweden and Denmark. On the contrary, there are countries that show greater shortcomings in terms of Good Governance as Romania, Bulgaria or Greece. The European Union countries were also grouped into clusters and the overview of rankings of individual countries for the period 2007–2017 was completed.

DOI: 10.2478/revecp-2019-0012
JEL: H83, H11
Keywords: European Union countries; evaluation; good governance; governance indicators; MCDM; TOPSIS

Abdelatiff, A.M. (2003). Good Governance and its relationship to democracy and economic development, [online]. 2003 [cit. 2019-07-22]. Available at:

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2010). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Power. New York: Crown Business.

Agere, S. (2000). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives, Managing the Public Service: Strategies for Improvement, No. 11, [online]. Commonwealth Secretariat, London. 2000 [cit. 2019-06-02].  DOI:  10.14217/9781848597129-en

Andrews, M. (2008). The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 379–423. DOI: 10.1080/13600810802455120

ARDIELLI, E. (2016). Implementation of Good Governance Concept in the European Union Member Countries. In ICEI 2016. Ostrava: VŠB-TUO, pp. 28- 36.

Ardielli, E., Halásková, M. (2015a). Evaluation of Good Governance in EU countries. Acta academica karviniensia. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 5-17. DOI: 10.25142/aak.2015.027

Ardielli, E., Halásková, M. (2015b). Assessment of E-government in EU countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Vol. 22, No. 34, pp. 4-16.

Bhutia, P. W., Phipon, R. (2012) Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem, Journal of Engineering, Vol. 2., No. 10, pp. 43-50.

Charron, N., Dijkstra, L. and V. Lapuente. (2015).  Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 315-346. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y

Clague, C. et al. (1999). Contract-intensive money: Contract enforcement, property rights, and economic performance. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 185-211. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009854405184

COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 2007. Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of    Ministers to member states on good administration. [online]. 2015 [cit. 2019-02-22] Available at:

Court, J., Hyden, G. (2003). World Governance Survey: a New Approach to Assessing Governance. Global Corruption Report 2003. [online]. 2003. [cit. 2019-02-12]. Available at:

Dincer, S. E. (2011). Multi-Criteria Analysis of Economic Activity for European Union Member States and Candidate Countries: TOPSIS and WSA Applications. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 563-572.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2018). A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU28 [online].  Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 [cit. 2019- 08-08]. Available at:

Ewaldt, J.A.G. 2001. Theories of Governance and New Public Management. [online].  2001  [cit. 2019- 07-06]. Available at:

FIALA, P. (2008). Modely a metody rozhodování. Praha: Oeconomica.

GriNdle, M.S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and freeform in developing countries. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, Vol. 17, pp. 525–548. DOI: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x

GRINDLE, M.S. (2007). Good Enough Governance Revisited. Development Policy Review, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 553-574. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x

HALDENWANG, C.V. (2004). Electronic government (E-Government) and development. The European Journal of Development Research. Vol.16, pp. 417–432.

JANN, W., RÖBER, M, and H. WOLLMANN. (2006). Public management – Grundlagen, Wirkungen, Kritik. Berlin: Sigma.

Jones, L.R., Kettl, D.F. (2003). Assessing public financial management reform in international context. International Public Management Review, Vol.4, pp. 1–16.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and M. Mastruzzi. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues [online].  World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430, 2010  [cit. 2019- 07-06]. Available at:

KEPING, Y. F. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 11, No.1. pp. 1–8.

Klenk, T., Nullmeier, F. (2004). Public Governance als Reforms Strategie. Düsseldorf: Edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.

KLIMOVSKÝ, D. (2010). Genéza koncepcie good governance a jej kritické prehodnotenie v teoretickej perspektíve. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics. Vol. 58, No.2, pp. 188-205.

KOOIMAN, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.

Kuncová, M. (2012). Elektronické obchodování - srovnání zemí EU v letech 2008-2009 s využitím metod vícekriteriálního hodnocení variant. In: IRCINGOVÁ, J., TLUČHOŘ, J., Trendy v podnikání 2012. Plzeň: ZČU, pp. 1–9.

LADI, S., RUSO-DRAGOUMIS, E. (2007). Study on Institutional Renewal and Good Governance in BSEC Member States. Athens: International Centre for Black Sea Studies.

Madzova, V., Sajnoski, K. and L. Davcev. (2013). E-Government as an Efficient Tool towards Good Governance. Balkan Social Science Review. Vol. 1, pp. 157-174.

North, C. D. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. 

Potůček, M. et al. (2007). Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. Praha: Grada, a.s.

POTĚŠIL, L. (2008).  Good Administration in Scope of the Council of Europe. Veřejná správa. Vol. 12, pp. VII - VIII. 

Pillay, P. (2016). The relationship between public administration and good governance: the case of South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 1, pp 18-31.

ROSZKOWSKA, E. (2011). Multi-criteria Decision Making Models by Applying the Topsis Method to Crisp and Interval Data. Multiple Criteria Decision Making.  Vol. 6, pp. 200-230.

Shih, H., Shyur, H. and E.S. Lee. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 45, No. 7-8, pp. 801-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023

Sundaram, J. K. (2018). Does good governance always boost development? [online].  World Economic Forum. 2018.  [cit. 2018- 08-08]. Available at:

ŠUBRT, T. et al. (2015). Ekonomicko-matematické metody. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, s.r.o.

UNPACS. (2018). Data Center - Government Development Index. [online].  2018.  [cit. 2018- 10-02]. Available at:

World Bank. (1992). Governance and development (English). Washington, DC : The World Bank.

World Bank. (2018). Worldwide Governance Indicators. [online].  2018.  [cit. 2018- 18-10]. Available at:

Yoon, K. P., Hwang, Ch. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction.  California: Sage.

Zanger, S. C. (2000). Good Governance and European Aid the Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics. Vol. 1, No.3, pp. 293-317. DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001003002

Žák, M. (2005). Kvalita správy: hodnocení a měření [online]. 2005 [cit. 2018- 11-12]. Available at: